EXHIBIT A-2. Viewgraphs. (Most of these viewgraphs have been retyped, and the page orientation has been changed for viewing convenience).
NAVAL AIRCRAFT
CONTRACTOR SELECTION PROCEDURES
OBJECTIVES
SELECT BEST PRODUCT
FAIR PRICE
FIRM DEFINITION
JUSTIFY SELECTION
AT MINIMUM EXPENSE
TIME
MANPOWER
COST
TO GOVERNMENT & INDUSTRY
BASIC STEPS
REQUIREMENT
DEFINE PROGRAM
PROGRAM APPROVAL
SOURCE SELECTION
CONTRACT
1. "NEGOTIATED" PROCUREMENT |
|||
NOT ADVERTISED | |||
2. CONTRACTOR SELECTION | |||
SOLE SOURCE | |||
UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS |
|||
MODS.OF EXISTING DESIGNS |
|||
"SOURCE SELECTION"-USAF, DOD |
|||
"SOURCE, NOT DESIGN" |
|||
MANAGEMENT PROPOSALS |
|||
DESIGN COMPETITION - NAVY | |||
QUALIFIED BIDDERS |
|||
TECHNICAL COMPETENCE |
|||
DESIGN PROPOSALS |
|||
EVALUATION -- GENERAL
WHO?
NAVAIR FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION
NO AD HOC COMMITTEES
HOW?
COMPARISON & ELIMINATION
NO POINT RATING SYSTEMS
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
WEIGHT,PERFORMANCE, STABILITY
& CONTROL, COSTS OP. ANALYSIS
QUALITATIVE RATINGS COMPONENTS, FEATURES, EQUIPMENTS
SUMMATION/ELIMINATION/COMPARISON
EVALUATION -- DETAIL
FIRST ROUND
WEIGHT ESTIMATE
PERFORMANCE EST. AT CONTR. WT. OF MAJOR ITEMS
DESIGN REVIEW -- ALL DIVISIONS
COST REVIEW
ELIMINATION OF LEAST PROMISING
SECOND ROUND
AT NAVAIR WT. AND CONFIGURATION
PERFORMANCE ESTIMATE
COST ESTIMATE
DETAIL COMPARISON
SUMMATION/RECOMMENDATION/DECISION
DEBRIEFING
PRESENTATION SCOPE
HISTORY, METHODOLOGY, & PERSONNEL
DESCRIPTION OF DESIGNS
NAVAIR ESTIMATES
WEIGHT & PERFORMANCE
FLYING QUALITIES
DIVISION RATINGS & RANKINGS
COST
PROCUREMENT PLAN, CONTRACT, SCHEDULE
MANAGEMENT ISSUES & RATINGS
SUMMARY - CONCLUSIONS-RECOMMENDATIONS
CONTRACTOR SELECTION
TYPICAL ORGANIZATION LEVELS INVOLVED
|
SEC DEF DDR&E, COMP., SA |
CONCUR |
|
SECNAV ASN(R&D), I&l, FM |
CONCUR |
|
CNO OP-05, OP-07 |
CONCUR |
|
CNM |
CONCUR |
|
NAVAIR 09-01, 02, 03, 04, 05, --- 505,510,PMA,503,520, 530, ---- |
SSA -- DECIDE SSAC -- RECOMMEND SSEB -- EVALUATE |
DECISIVE FACTORS
WEIGHT
HANDLING, LOGISTICS, COST
SIZE
PERFORMANCE
SPEED, RADIUS, CARRIER W.O.D.,
SINGLE ENGINE CLIMB
MANEUVERABILITY, TAKE-OFF
FLYING QUALITIES
DESIGN EXCELLENCE
COST
GENERAL PROBLEMS
NAVAIR VS. INDUSTRY ESTIMATING ABILITY
INDUSTRY -- MORE MANPOWER
NAVAIR -- MORE DATA
MORE EXPERIENCE
MORE OBJECTIVE
DEMAND FOR QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF QUALITATIVE FACTORS
PROLIFERATION OF STANDARDS, CRITERIA, AND RULES DESIGNED TO SOLVE PROBLEMS WHICH DON'T EXIST
TYPICAL POINT SYSTEM
OPERATIONAL 330
LOGISTICS 140
MANAGEMENT 200
TECHNICAL 300
AIR VEHICLE 100 ITEMS
STRUCTURE
ALIGHTING GEAR FACTORS
DYNAMICS
AERODYNAMICS (25)
SUBFACTORS
AIRCRAFT CONFIG.
INT. AERO
DRAG SUBFACTORS
WIND TUNNEL
MANEUVERABILITY
PERFORMANCE (5)
SUMMARY
SOURCE SELECTION BY DESIGN COMPETITION
UTILIZES EXPERIENCED PERSONNEL
IS FAIR TO INDUSTRY
PROVIDES DATA TO JUSTIFY
IS SIMPLE
AND
IT WORKS